For a wiki, we can try wikia.com... the subject matter may be too specialized for them, though.
We could fairly easily make the wiki self-hosting, using the wiki software in the Monticello repositories (I think SqueakSource, but not entirely sure).
What kind of outlay can the Squeak Foundation afford for wiki hosting, if necessary?
-Kyle H
On 10/16/06, Krishna Sankar ksankar@doubleclix.net wrote:
I am still figuring out things with the Google project. By tomorrow cob, will see how we all can get SVN write access. BTW, for the records, the Google project is squeak-cc-validation http://code.google.com/p/squeak-cc-validation/.
On the CC side, I think the major tasks are :
1. Decide on the protection profile(s) we want to address 2. Define the claims and security target Most probably we would need 3-4 configurations 3. Start a function List and Test Matrix (Where can we host a
Wiki?) (This will help us prove our case, so we should start this task ASAP)
4. Develop the ToE 5. Understand and document the cc process relevant to us. Read
and mark the cc documents, talk with Labs et al
6. Formal cc effort
Kyle, the cc documentation will help us in these tasks. I will add these tasks and will start double-clicking task #1.
Cheers
<k/>
-----Original Message----- From: cryptography-bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org [mailto:cryptography-bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org] On Behalf Of Kyle Hamilton Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 8:33 PM To: Cryptography Team Development List Subject: [Cryptography Team] Common Criteria Documentation...
I found the Google Code project that Krishna started, and uploaded the Common Criteria documentation I found (in PDF form) to it as an issue. Unfortunately, I don't have SVN write access, and I don't know how to get it either.
After reading it, I realized that it /IS/ a good idea for anyone starting on CC validation to read it before they start. It's important to realize what it is, and what the goals must be. (As well, it also helps customers -- that'd include you, Ron -- understand what the various validation levels are, and compare them to regulatory requirement.)
--
-Kyle H I speak only for myself. I don't have the faintest clue about anyone else. _______________________________________________ Cryptography mailing list Cryptography@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cry
ptography
Cryptography mailing list Cryptography@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
cryptography@lists.squeakfoundation.org