Hi,
When I tried to publish System-md.2.mcz, mc told me that there are newer versions. In the inbox, there is System-dvf.5, but this does not have System-dew.1.mcz as ancestor. So should that be ignored? Or merged?
Marcus
Hi Marcus!
I made that version off of the first packaged image. I think the "original packages" were recreated since then, explaining the discrepancy.
If you decide the change made is correct, I'm sure MC can merge it anyway, and if not, I'll create a new package with the code.
Daniel
Marcus Denker wrote:
Hi,
When I tried to publish System-md.2.mcz, mc told me that there are newer versions. In the inbox, there is System-dvf.5, but this does not have System-dew.1.mcz as ancestor. So should that be ignored? Or merged?
Marcus
Am 13.07.2005 um 00:45 schrieb Marcus Denker:
Hi,
When I tried to publish System-md.2.mcz, mc told me that there are newer versions. In the inbox, there is System-dvf.5, but this does not have System-dew.1.mcz as ancestor. So should that be ignored? Or merged?
It's only a warning, a hint to be careful.
In this case, you can ignore it. The check is not designed to be smart, but to be fast. It only compares file names instead of downloading all those versions, which might be rather expensive.
We might change the test to only look into the repository you are publishing to (currently it looks in all repositories known to the working copy).
- Bert -
packages@lists.squeakfoundation.org
-
Bert Freudenberg -
Daniel Vainsencher -
Marcus Denker