Merged via Tools-ct.1247. :-)
---
Sent from Squeak Inbox Talk
On 2021-02-01T10:12:23-08:00, eliot.miranda@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
>
> I have no objection. I'd like it if Context>>tempNamed:[put:] were in
> *Tools-Debugger-accessing rather than accessing. But other than that it
> looks good to me.
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 8:40 AM Christoph Thiede <
> christoph.thiede at student.hpi.uni-potsdam.de> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > please forgive me for pushing this proposal again after 13 months :-)
> >
> > Three questions here for everyone to answer:
> >
> > 1. What do you think about the proposal in general? Is it worth merging it
> > into the Trunk? (Personally, I like to use it nearly every day ...)
> > 2. If you have no objections, what keeps us from merging it? :-)
> > 3. Naming battle: #tempNamed:[put:] vs #tempVarNamed:[put:]?
> >
> > Side note: If we get this into Trunk, we can also use it in Compiler to
> > produce more comprehensible #DoItIn: methods, for instance, "(ThisContext
> > tempNamed: 'failBlock') value" instead of "(ThisContext namedTempAt: 2)
> > value" - provided that sources are available.
> >
> > Best,
> > Christoph
> >
> >
> >
> > -----
> > Carpe Squeak!
> > --
> > Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Squeak-Dev-f45488.html
> >
> >
>
> --
> _,,,^..^,,,_
> best, Eliot