On 10/4/07, Jason Johnson <jason.johnson.081@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/18/07, goran@krampe.se <goran@krampe.se> wrote:
>
> This reasoning makes no real sense to me. Why would multiple levels be
> "better"? Are we afraid of running out of namespace names? IMHO the
> proliferation of namespaces and hierarchies of them in other languages
> (like Java) is more based on the fact that they are used for
> organisational purposes.

Well my reasoning is simple:  we have effectively a flat namespace
now, and it doesn't seem to be enough.  If we add just one more level
then we increase our scale by quite a bit but you still have the
siltation like:


<snip>

If there was anything important in the rest of your email, could you summarise it for me? I'm not going to read the whole thing.

Gulik.

--
http://people.squeakfoundation.org/person/mikevdg
http://gulik.pbwiki.com/