Frank Mueller schrieb:

Naja, OK, ich kann einiges auch icht immer nachvollziehen. Das stimmt schon. Man muss wohl die
Sprachen auch imemr in verlgeichbar loesbare Aufgabenstellungen separieren. Die Zahlen fuer die
SLOC/FP finden sich dafuer hingegen in vielen Tabellen wieder. Diese nehme ich nur gerne, da sie
recht vollstaendig ist. Die Werte der anderen Tabellen weichen nicht sehr stark ab.
FYI

Literaturanhang:

  1. Bames, B.; Durek, T.; Gaffney, J.: A Framework and Economic Foundation for Software Reuse. in IEEE Tutorial Software Reuse Ed. W. Tracz, IEEE Press, L.A., 1988, p. 77

  2. Brodie, M.; Stonebraker, M.: Migrating Legacy Systems. Morgan Kaufmann Pub., San Francisco, 1995

  3. Chapin, N.: A Measure of Software Complexity. in Proc. of NCC, Chicago, 1977, p. 995

  4. Cimitile, A.; De Lucia, A.; Minro, M.: A Specification Driven Slicing Process for identifying Reusable Functions. in Journal of Software Maintenance, Vol. 8, No. 3, May 1996, p. 145

  5. Dahl, O.; Dijkstra, E.; Hoare, C.: Structured Programming. Academic Press, London, 1972, p. 63

  6. Dumke, R.; Foltin, E.; Koeppe, R.; Winkler, A.: Software Qualität durch Meßtools. Vieweg Verlag, Braunschweig, 1996

  7. Endres, A.: Software-Wiederverwendung - Ziele, Wege und Erfahrungen. in Informatik Spektrum, Nov. 1988, p. 85

  8. Fenton, N.: Software Metrics - A rigorous approach. Chapman & Hall, London, 1991

  9. Halstead, M.: Elements of Software Science. Elvesier Pub., New York, 1977, p. 79

  10. Hehner, E.: Predicative Programming. in Comm. of ACM, Vol. 27, No. 2, Feb. 1984, p.134

  11. Henry, S.; Kafura, D.: Software Structure Metrics based on Information Flow. in IEEE Trans. on S.E. , Vol 7, No. 5, Sept. 1981

  12. ISO/IEC: Software Product Evaluation - Quality Characteristics and Guidelines for their use. ISO/IEC Standard ISO-9126, 1991

  13. Kozacynski, W.; Niny, J.: Program Concept Recognition and Transformation in IEEE Trans. on S.E., Vol. 18, No.12, Dec. 1992, p. 1065

  14. Lanubile, G.; Visaggio, G.: Extracting Reusable Functions by Flow Graph-Based Program Slicing. in IEEE Trans. on S.E., Vol. 23, No. 4, April 1997, p. 246

  15. Li, W.: An Empirical Study of Software Reuse in Reconstructive Maintenance. in Journal of Software Maintenance, Vol. 9, No. 2, March 1997, p. 69

  16. McCabe, T.: A Complexity Measure. in IEEE Trans. on S.E., Vol. 7, No. 5, Sept.1981

  17. Schach, S.: Economic Impact of Software Reuse on Maintenance. in Journal of Software Maintenance, Vol. 6, No. 4, July 1994, p. 185

  18. Sneed, H.: Economics of Software Reengineering. in Journal of Software Maintenance, Vol. 3, No. 3, Sept. 1991, p. 163

  19. Sneed, H.: Software muß messbar werden. in Information Management 4/91, Nov. 1991, p.56

  20. Sneed, H.: Understanding Software through Numbers - A metric based Approach to Program Comprehension. in Journal of Software Maintenance, Vol. 7, No. 6, Nov. 1995, p. 405

  21. Sneed, H.: Encapsulating Legacy Software for Use in Client/Server Systems. in Proc. of 3rd Conf. in Reverse Eng., IEEE Press, Monterey, Nov. 1996, p. 104

  22. Welker, K.; Oman, P.; Atkinson, G.: Development and Applikation of an automated Source Code Maintainability Index. in Journal of Software Maintenance, Vol. 9, No. 3, May 1997, p. 127

  23. Zuse, H.: Software Complexity - Measures and Methods. de Gruyter Verlag, Berlin, 1991

  24. Mary B. Chrissis, Mike Konrad, Sandy Shrum: CMMI. Guidelines for process integration and product improvement. Addison-Wesley, Boston 2003

  25. Ralf Kneuper: CMMI. Verbesserung von Softwareprozessen mit Capability Maturity Model Integration. 2., überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage. dpunkt.verlag, Heidelberg 2006

  26. Ernest Wallmüller: SPI - Software Process Improvement mit CMMI und ISO 15504. Hanser, München 2006

Guido Stepken