Karl wrote:
Brad Fuller wrote:
What do you think about creating a page, or a portion of a page (don't know where this would go) about what others are saying about squeak?
Here's a favorable review:
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2006/09/21/learning_smalltalk.html
If there are others, (I think there are several good reviews and blog mentions about seaside and dabbledb) it would be a nice page to promote squeak. Don't you think?
Sounds good, Brad. Create such a page.
Great. What should it be called? Any ideas?
All: Please pass me some links to favorable reviews about squeak or squeak applications and I'll put them on the page. Also, if you could pass a one or two-liner about the review, that'd be great.
On another note: I looked trough the site yesterday and I think most of the text on the pages should be revisited. They are either out of date or missing care and attention.
What do you other guys think ?
Good idea. We might start at looking at who's assigned to which page and making sure they still want to contribute. There are also some pages with no contributors. Volunteers anyone????
Brad Fuller skrev:
Karl wrote:
Brad Fuller wrote:
What do you think about creating a page, or a portion of a page (don't know where this would go) about what others are saying about squeak?
Here's a favorable review:
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2006/09/21/learning_smalltalk.html
If there are others, (I think there are several good reviews and blog mentions about seaside and dabbledb) it would be a nice page to promote squeak. Don't you think?
Sounds good, Brad. Create such a page.
Great. What should it be called? Any ideas?
Hm, I'm not sure what to call it. 'User review' ? There are some cool quotes in the Squeakers DVD.
All: Please pass me some links to favorable reviews about squeak or squeak applications and I'll put them on the page. Also, if you could pass a one or two-liner about the review, that'd be great.
On another note: I looked trough the site yesterday and I think most of the text on the pages should be revisited. They are either out of date or missing care and attention.
What do you other guys think ?
Good idea. We might start at looking at who's assigned to which page and making sure they still want to contribute. There are also some pages with no contributors. Volunteers anyone????
I counted 36 pages for the site. Some need a little more than others. The screenshot page is not that great. Larry is doing the About page. The Front page is up to date. Documentation is not in a good shape, Mathew Fulmer in the documentation team was willing to help, maybe he will do them ? Features pages could be updated again
Does anybody remember how to add users to the page ? Mathew and Larry should have access to do their stuff.
Karl
What about calling it "What others are saying..." -- I'm not very creative, but it gets the point across.
RE: pages... I would like to revisit the screenshots page, but I haven't had the time to devote to it. As we can all see, posting up screenshots is not that hard. Making screenshots actually look good in a web page is something else. I don't think I have that talent.
About the users, just have them email me separately with a username and password and I will set them up.
On 1/26/07, karl karl.ramberg@comhem.se wrote:
Brad Fuller skrev:
Karl wrote:
Brad Fuller wrote:
What do you think about creating a page, or a portion of a page (don't know where this would go) about what others are saying about squeak?
Here's a favorable review:
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2006/09/21/learning_smalltalk.html
If there are others, (I think there are several good reviews and blog mentions about seaside and dabbledb) it would be a nice page to promote squeak. Don't you think?
Sounds good, Brad. Create such a page.
Great. What should it be called? Any ideas?
Hm, I'm not sure what to call it. 'User review' ? There are some cool quotes in the Squeakers DVD.
All: Please pass me some links to favorable reviews about squeak or squeak applications and I'll put them on the page. Also, if you could pass a one or two-liner about the review, that'd be great.
On another note: I looked trough the site yesterday and I think most of the text on the pages should be revisited. They are either out of date or missing care and attention.
What do you other guys think ?
Good idea. We might start at looking at who's assigned to which page and making sure they still want to contribute. There are also some pages with no contributors. Volunteers anyone????
I counted 36 pages for the site. Some need a little more than others. The screenshot page is not that great. Larry is doing the About page. The Front page is up to date. Documentation is not in a good shape, Mathew Fulmer in the documentation team was willing to help, maybe he will do them ? Features pages could be updated again
Does anybody remember how to add users to the page ? Mathew and Larry should have access to do their stuff.
Karl
Webteam mailing list Webteam@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/webteam
webteam@lists.squeakfoundation.org
-
Brad Fuller -
Jason Rogers -
karl