[Newbies] Why hasn't Smalltalk been wildly accepted?

[Rick Kitts]

Perhaps because it's intended audience or purpose has little to do  
with what "real" programmers are interested in? Which would be a  
shame because it seems pretty clear that whatever those interests are  
they haven't done a great deal to advance the practice very much.

---Rick

PS: "real" is in quotes up there. No troll intended.

On Aug 8, 2006, at 2:17 AM, 啸然 wrote:

> My opinion is, the power of Smalltalk is same as an OS, but  
> Smalltalk is as a programming language. The Smalltalk should be an OS.
> _______________________________________________
> Beginners mailing list
> Beginners at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners