[Newbies] general questions about squeak
Esteban Robles Luna
esteban.roblesluna at gmail.com
Thu Oct 5 13:09:29 UTC 2006
Thanks for your reply!
On 10/4/06, Yoshiki Ohshima <yoshiki at squeakland.org> wrote:
> > I`m new in squeak, but not in smalltalk. I have some questions about
> > the environment of squeak that will help me to understand it.
> > - Firstly, I would like to know how the startup process of squeak is,
> > as detailed as possible.
> - The VM compiled by a C compiler is loaded onto the memory.
> - The VM allocates a big chunk of memory and load the content of a
> Squeak .image file on to the chunk pretty much as it is.
> - In the loaded image, the pointers may have different offset when
> it was saved, and the endianness may be different, too. VM
> adjusts them.
> - Now, VM look for the initial context and compiled method to dive
> in and Squeak code start running.
> - Usually, the initial context is in SmalltalkImage>>snapshot:andQuit:embedded:.
> After doing a few things, it start processing the "start up
> - The start up list consists of classes that need to do something
> upon startup. You can inspect StartUp class var of
> SystemDictionary and #startUp: methods of them (on the class
Yes, this class is responsible of notifying objects that want to know
that the image has opened.
> - Then the UI process gets started and usual interaction begins.
Is this hardcoded in the VM? or is SmalltalkImage responsible of the
start up process and then delegates the control to this process?
> > - Second, MVC projects are just wrapped from morphic?. Later I will
> > explain why I want to know this.
> Yes, I can figure out what you are asking^^;
> > - Third, who is responsible of opening the main window and if it`s
> > possible to open other windows without using wxWidgets or something
> > like that. Is it hardcoded in the vm or elsewhere?
> It pretty much is.
> > Why I`m asking these questions?
> > Because I`m interested in using squeak as an alternative for small
> > commercial projects. I want to know if it`s viable of developing an
> > MVC with at least one look and feel and a little core of widgets.
> > I have a look at BobsUI but it`s build on Morphic.
> There may be some confusion among os window and os widgets. From
> what I read, you seems to want to use OS widgets. There are a few
> attempts to make the emulation of OS widgets work, but none is well
I think that you misunderstand me. The only thing I want from the OS
is that I can open new windows. HostWindowPlugin works?. I want to
have my own widgets implemented in smalltalk, but I want them to look
and feel like OS ones. Why? Because for normal people is costly to get
used to new widgets like Morphic ones.
> Morphic is in general better to do such look enhancements than MVC
> though. What is the reason for doing it in MVC rather than Morphic.
> (I can imagine a few, but want to hear yours).
Because It´s faster, It´s easier for programmers that came from other
smalltalk distributions like VisualWorks, Smalltalk/X, Dolphin to use
it, it`s simple. Many people discard Squeak for doing some projects
because they think it´s UI is not suitable for normal people. I want
Squeak to be my best option for this kind of applications too. I want
to hear yours! I think that each UI framework has it`s advantages and
disadvantages. If I want to develop multimedia application I would
choice Morphic, but what about a simple UI with common widgets? I need
a simple framework like MVC, but with an improved looking.
> -- Yoshiki
> Beginners mailing list
> Beginners at lists.squeakfoundation.org
More information about the Beginners