[Newbies] block in recursion, Any cure for that kind of situation?

[Marcin Tustin]

I figured it out - I meant monticello + squeaksource.

Having loaded newcompiler, ast, blockchecker, and newcompilerloader, it
doesn't seem to have made a difference.

On Jan 23, 2008 12:00 AM, Marcin Tustin <mm3 at zepler.net> wrote:

> So am I right in thinking that if I get newCompiler, blocks will work as I
> would expect them to (like lambdas)?
>
> If so, how do I get the most recent version? I remember there being
> something that has superceded squeakmap, but I can't seem to find it.
>
>
> On Jan 22, 2008 11:42 PM, Ben Goetter <goetter at mazama.net> wrote:
>
> > >This is a maintenance nightmare waiting to happen.  Use a proper method
> > call,
> >
> > Squeak Smalltalk blocks are just similar enough to Scheme lambdas that I
> > still fall into this trap, too.
> >
> > (letrec ((carre (lambda (s1 s2 s3 s4 n)
> >                 (if (> n 0)
> >                  (carre (segment s1 s2)
> >                         (segment s2 s3)
> >                         (segment s3 s4)
> >                         (segment s1 s4)
> >                         (- n 1))))))
> >  'oops-must-remember-this-is-Squeak-not-Scheme)
> >
> > Ben
> > _______________________________________________
> > Beginners mailing list
> > Beginners at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/beginners/attachments/20080123/98622240/attachment.htm