[Newbies] Squeak-specific syntax

Matthias Berth matthias.berth at googlemail.com
Wed Oct 29 21:51:09 UTC 2008


the @ method is not specific to Squeak. I guess it has been included
in the earliest versions of Smalltalk already.

I don't know about any other Squeak-specific syntax (apart from arrays).

If you're concerned about portability of your code to other Smalltalk
dialects then you might want to have a look at how the Seaside project
handles it. They have some tool that finds problematic code.



On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:43 PM, Mark Volkmann <mark at ociweb.com> wrote:
> I know that the syntax for literal and dynamic arrays is specific to Squeak.
> Is the @ method in the Number class for creating Point objects specific to
> Squeak?
> Is there any other syntax that is specific to Squeak?
> ---
> Mark Volkmann
> _______________________________________________
> Beginners mailing list
> Beginners at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners

More information about the Beginners mailing list