[Newbies] Re: How to sort a SortedCollection like you can sort a
table in Excel?
Jerome Peace
peace_the_dreamer at yahoo.com
Tue Apr 13 00:12:04 UTC 2010
--- On Mon, 4/12/10, keith <keith_hodges at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> From: keith <keith_hodges at yahoo.co.uk>
> Subject: Re: [Newbies] Re: How to sort a SortedCollection like you can sort a table in Excel?
> To: "A friendly place to get answers to even the most basic questions about Squeak." <beginners at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
> Date: Monday, April 12, 2010, 4:53 PM
> I add a <= to
>
> then you can write:
>
> [ :a :b | { a width. a depth. } <= { b width. b depth }
> ]
>
> regards
>
> Keith
For the win!
Cool, Keith.
It's easy to forget how smart collection are.
Cheers, --Jer
>
>
> On 12 Apr 2010, at 17:52, Andreas Raab wrote:
>
> > On 4/12/2010 7:48 AM, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> >> Hmm, indenting it like this makes it more
> obvious:
> >>
> >> a height> b height or:
> [
> >> a height = b height and: [
> >> a
> width> b width or: [
> >> a width = b
> width and: [
> >>
> a depth> b depth]]]]
> >
> > Personally, I write multi-level sort blocks like
> here:
> >
> > a height = b height
> > ifTrue:[a width
> = b width
> >
> ifTrue:[a depth >= b depth]]
> >
> ifFalse:[a width >= b width]
> > ifFalse:[a
> height >= b height]
> >
> > Cheers,
> > - Andreas
> > _______________________________________________
> > Beginners mailing list
> > Beginners at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners
>
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Beginners mailing list
> Beginners at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners
>
More information about the Beginners
mailing list