[Newbies] Re: PipeableOSProcess incremental output

[Sean P. DeNigris]

Sean P. DeNigris wrote
> 
> I got a little further. #updateErrorPipelineStream helped to get the error
> messages as they came.
> 

Dave, based on your answers, this seems like it should not be necessary, yet
without it #errorUpToEnd returned an empty string even though there was
output available. Is there an internal flush that's not getting done?

Sean

--
View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/PipeableOSProcess-incremental-output-tp3946435p4110568.html
Sent from the Squeak - Beginners mailing list archive at Nabble.com.