[Newbies] Re: PipeableOSProcess incremental output
Sean P. DeNigris
sean at clipperadams.com
Sat Nov 26 15:40:42 UTC 2011
Sean P. DeNigris wrote
> I got a little further. #updateErrorPipelineStream helped to get the error
> messages as they came.
Dave, based on your answers, this seems like it should not be necessary, yet
without it #errorUpToEnd returned an empty string even though there was
output available. Is there an internal flush that's not getting done?
View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/PipeableOSProcess-incremental-output-tp3946435p4110568.html
Sent from the Squeak - Beginners mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the Beginners