[Newbies] Re: optimization (and late binding)

[paolo.bernardi.67 at gmail.com]

Thanks,
I realized that it's not such true that
a message sent to a constant value
*must* return a constant value too.

Il 24/11/2013 15.39, Levente Uzonyi ha scritto:
> Since message sends are late bound, it means that if you want to cache
> something, then you have to do it yourself.
I know (or I think I know) what late binding means,
but I can't figure the connection with the topic of caching the return 
value.
In other words: if st was NOT late binding, things were different about
the to cache or not to cache some return value?
Can you clear to me the idea?

molte grazie (= many thanks)