<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 7/20/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Bert Freudenberg</b> <<a href="mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org">email@example.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>On Jul 20, 2007, at 11:31 , Marcin Tustin wrote:<br><br>><br>><br>> On 7/20/07, Bert Freudenberg <<a href="mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org">email@example.com</a>> wrote: On Jul<br>> 20, 2007, at 8:52 , Louis Moon wrote:
<br><br>> ...and yes, of course, there is a runtime.<br><br>Well, you could say there is only runtime. Which makes the term<br>useless, as it implies some sort of opposite.<br><br></blockquote></div>Then how would you refer to runtime? In any case, we can oppose it to code-definition time. Nothing exciting may happen then, but it's worth being able to talk about it.