Would it be easier to bring Scratch forward to run on a newer version of Squeak?<div><br></div><div>Clinton<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Yoshiki Ohshima <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:yoshiki@vpri.org">yoshiki@vpri.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">At Fri, 28 May 2010 10:55:31 -0600,<br>
<div class="im">Clinton Blackmore wrote:<br>
><br>
> Very interesting. It looks like I will probably not get to try any of these methods until next week, but, what sort of<br>
> adjustments do you think it would need for Scratch images?<br>
<br>
</div> The biggest single issue is that my ImageBrowser depends on<br>
InterpreterSimulator to load the image file and find out the object<br>
pointers in it. An older version of InterpreterSimulator that is<br>
suitable for the Scratch image can be found somewhere (like in the<br>
Squeak2.4 image) but bringing in it will take some efforts.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
-- Yoshiki<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Beginners mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Beginners@lists.squeakfoundation.org">Beginners@lists.squeakfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners" target="_blank">http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>