Swik -> box2?

Ken Causey ken at kencausey.com
Wed Nov 16 18:08:30 UTC 2005

Couldn't we just have http://swiki.squeak.org/ and avoid having to
remember the extra path?

Or maybe http://wiki.squeak.org/ would be better since I'm not sure it's
all that relevant to most people exactly what wiki implementation is
being used.  I mean, it shouldn't be necessary to remember it.


On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 08:32 +0100, Cees De Groot wrote:
> On 11/16/05, Jochen F. Rick <nadja at cc.gatech.edu> wrote:
> > We'll lock down the swiki, transfer it, have it back up and running, and
> > then I'll convert the minnow site to a forward swiki.
> >
> Sounds like a good plan :). The forward swiki will just spit out 301 redirects?
> As for the URL, good suggestion to start discussing this thing now. I
> think swiki.squeak.org/squeak would be the most logical thing to do.
> Alternatvely www.squeak.org/swiki? box admins, what do you think?
> Regards,
> Cees
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/box-admins/attachments/20051116/a75eb988/attachment.pgp

More information about the Box-admins mailing list