source.squeak.org for SqueakSource...

[Ken Causey]

For what it's worth my opinion is that IF in the end the two community
Squeak Source servers are merged (and I'm not personally convinced that
is the best way to go, but I'm not strongly opposed to it either), THEN
it makes sense to use the hostname source.squeak.org for it.

Now, today, I'm quite happy to setup sourcetest.squeak.org.  In fact,
I've just done that:

+sourcetest.squeak.org:130.92.65.106

Use it if you like, ignore it if you prefer.

I think we need to first concentrate on speaking with those people that
have an interest in the two servers and seeing if anyone has any
objections to the merge.  If for any reason we decide against the merge
then I think it would be a mistake to have assigned the
source.squeak.org hostname to the external packages server.  And as Cees
has said you can go ahead and do everything you need to do test and
confirm the setup, even use it, using the sourcetest hostname for now
and when and if the merge occurs changing the hostname will be a minor
job compared to the rest of it.

Ken
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/box-admins/attachments/20060113/003cf934/attachment.pgp