SqueakSource usage levels?
Doug Way
dway at mailcan.com
Mon Mar 20 22:49:48 UTC 2006
Thanks Ken, setting up tightvnc to view the image directly sounds like a
great idea.
- Doug
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:53:41 -0600, "Ken Causey" <ken at kencausey.com>
said:
> As of today it has grown to 149 MB of memory (resident set size). I'm
> going to set up tightvnc so I can check the image more directly. I hope
> that's OK with you. I will let you know the password once I have set it
> up.
>
> Ken
>
> On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 13:18 -0500, Doug Way wrote:
> > I'm pretty sure it shouldn't be using that much memory. It may be that
> > cruft has accumulated in the image as it's been running for a long time.
> >
> > You could try restarting the process, and see how much memory it says it
> > uses after the restart?
> >
> > - Doug
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 12:13:02 -0600, "Ken Causey" <ken at kencausey.com>
> > said:
> > > I'm wondering if the current usage level (primarily memory, but also
> > > CPU) that I'm seeing for source.squeakfoundation.org are to be expected.
> > >
> > > Should it be using 320MB of memory? Note that this compares to
> > > approximately 40MB for all other Squeak server processes running.
> > >
> > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
> > > 12479 squeakso 15 0 1026m 320m 2456 S 15.3 32.1 1837:28
> > > squeakvm
> > >
> > > Ken
> >
More information about the Box-admins
mailing list