[Box-Admins] Re: Mailing list for the squeak documentation team

Ken Causey ken at kencausey.com
Mon Oct 16 18:27:41 UTC 2006

Thanks Marcus!  I certainly had no objection to this.  In fact my
personal opinion on anything like this that doesn't have the smell of
controvery is to just go ahead and do it, notify everyone, and ask
forgiveness if there are complaints after the fact.


On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 13:41 +0200, Marcus Denker wrote:
> On 14.10.2006, at 04:58, Matthew Fulmer wrote:
> > Hi. I believe that there is a need for the documentation team to
> > have a central place to discuss issues. A mailing list would be
> > the best place I think. I know that a mailing list for two
> > people may be overkill, but I hope that it will grow. Also, none
> > of the existing lists on squeakfoundation seem appropriate,
> > although webteam is close.
> >
> > Craig Latta told me that one of you two would know what to do.
> >
> > So, can we have a mailing list?
> Ok, I made a list (squeak-doc) with you as the admin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/box-admins/attachments/20061016/185ba509/attachment.pgp

More information about the Box-Admins mailing list