[Box-Admins] Re: [V3dot10] <sin asunto>
ken at kencausey.com
Fri Feb 2 21:57:54 UTC 2007
On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 00:07 -0500, Doug Way wrote:
> Yes, the superuser flag was something that has to be set in the
> image. I'm still a superuser... at least it still allows me to add
> developers & admins to any project for example. I think the version
> of squeaksource running at source.squeakfoundation.org is fairly old,
> so that there is no "Edit Settings" that I can see.
> For storage backend, it was just a directory of files, and I assume
> that's still the case? (Not sure if you've made any major changes to
> the squeaksource configuration, Ken...)
> - Doug
No not really. I set myself as superuser, and there was some problem we
fixed (which is why I was in the image in the first place), but I have
not changed anything of significance.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/box-admins/attachments/20070202/9ff2694b/attachment.pgp
More information about the Box-Admins