[Box-Admins] Re: Swik -> box2?
Jochen F. Rick
nadja at cc.gatech.edu
Fri Jan 5 15:32:34 UTC 2007
That should be OK. I think that was a VM that Lex built for Georgia Tech
a while back. I think the normal squeak VM should be fine, but I haven't
tested it. I'm not sure if it would actually save you any RAM.
Peace and Luck!
Je77
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 09:05:39AM -0600, Ken Causey wrote:
> Jochen,
>
> Hi. A quick question. I notice that on box2 you are running the wiki
> using a local copy of the squeak vm at /home/wiki/squeak . Is there a
> particular reason for that or were you simply unaware that we have a
> copy of the vm at /usr/bin/squeakvm ? If not it would save a few
> megabytes of RAM I believe if you were to restart the wiki with the same
> VM that all other instance of squeak on the box are currently using.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Ken
>
> P.S. On another note shouldn't we setup the wiki process under
> daemontools to ensure it is restarted if it crashes or the box is
> rebooted? I would be happy to assist with that.
--
Jochen "Jeff" Rick, PhD Candidate, Georgia Tech College of Computing
jochen.rick at cc.gatech.edu, http://www.je77.com/, work: 404-385-1105
More information about the Box-Admins
mailing list