[Box-Admins] Re: Swik -> box2?

Jochen F. Rick nadja at cc.gatech.edu
Fri Jan 5 15:32:34 UTC 2007


That should be OK. I think that was a VM that Lex built for Georgia Tech 
a while back. I think the normal squeak VM should be fine, but I haven't 
tested it. I'm not sure if it would actually save you any RAM.

Peace and Luck!

Je77


On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 09:05:39AM -0600, Ken Causey wrote:
> Jochen,
> 
> Hi.  A quick question.  I notice that on box2 you are running the wiki
> using a local copy of the squeak vm at /home/wiki/squeak .  Is there a
> particular reason for that or were you simply unaware that we have a
> copy of the vm at /usr/bin/squeakvm ?  If not it would save a few
> megabytes of RAM I believe if you were to restart the wiki with the same
> VM that all other instance of squeak on the box are currently using.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Ken
> 
> P.S. On another note shouldn't we setup the wiki process under
> daemontools to ensure it is restarted if it crashes or the box is
> rebooted?  I would be happy to assist with that.



-- 
Jochen "Jeff" Rick, PhD Candidate, Georgia Tech College of Computing
jochen.rick at cc.gatech.edu, http://www.je77.com/, work: 404-385-1105


More information about the Box-Admins mailing list