[Box-Admins] RE: [squeak-dev] testing - please ignore
Cees de Groot
casedeg at gmail.com
Thu Jan 5 09:28:38 UTC 2012
Just checked, Gandi has executed zone xfer and is thus now also a NS for squeakfoundation.org
Best,
Cees
On 3 Jan, 2012, at 21:54 , Ken Causey wrote:
> Thanks
>
> 217.70.177.40:allow,AXFR="squeakfoundation.org/squeak.org"
>
> added to axfrdns configuration.
>
> Ken
>
> P.S. Just noticed that the way way old list address for the Box-Admins
> team was in the Cc. I've corrected it in this message and someone needs
> to update their address book.
>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] testing - please ignore
>> From: Cees de Groot <casedeg at gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, January 03, 2012 2:02 pm
>> To: "Ken Causey" <ken at kencausey.com>
>> Cc: "Randal L. Schwartz" <merlyn at stonehenge.com>,
>> box-admins at discuss.squeakfoundation.org
>>
>>
>> I can provide secondary on a machine I run (at Inception hosting here in .EU), or Gandi can provide secondary/ternary. For that to work, ns6.gandi.net 217.70.177.40 needs to be allowed to do zone xfers.
>>
>> It's indeed not a big thing - with one machine comprising the whole infrastructure, it's hardly relevant if DNS still works when box2 is down :)
>>
>>
>> On 3 Jan, 2012, at 20:23 , Ken Causey wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, b.ns was the old Box1 at byteservers (IIRC) and no longer exists.
>>> We've managed to limp along OK with one for years now. That said, if we
>>> can use gandi.net as a backup DNS and re-point b.ns at them, that would
>>> be great. We will need to allow mirroring of the dns records of course.
>>>
>>> Ken
>>>
>>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>> Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] testing - please ignore
>>>> From: Cees de Groot <casedeg at gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Tue, January 03, 2012 12:54 pm
>>>> To: "Randal L. Schwartz" <merlyn at stonehenge.com>, Ken Causey
>>>> <ken at kencausey.com>
>>>> Cc: box-admins at discuss.squeakfoundation.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Also added glue records for a.ns and b.ns, threw them into the zone file as well for good measure. I can probably safely swap NS back to the two official nameservers now.
>>>>
>>>> Is it correct that b.ns is not responding?
>>>>
>>>> On 3 Jan, 2012, at 19:42 , Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Cees" == Cees de Groot <casedeg at gmail.com> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>> Cees> Most important is MX, isn't it? Still same box as squeak.org?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, if we can get lists.squeakfoundation.org to point A and MX both at
>>>>> squeak.org, we'll be 90% of the way there. That's what has everything
>>>>> shut down right now.
>>>>>
>>>>> And maybe "discuss.", from the looks of these headers. Same thing.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
>>>>> <merlyn at stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
>>>>> Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
>>>>> See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion
>>>
>
More information about the Box-Admins
mailing list