[Box-Admins] Re: Jenkins reliability ( was Re: [squeak-dev] 6
tests to go...)
ken at kencausey.com
Wed Oct 24 17:29:45 UTC 2012
Perhaps it is unrelated but I updated Jenkins to 1.487 a couple of hours
On 10/24/2012 12:06 PM, Chris Cunnington wrote:
> On 2012-10-24 10:45 AM, Levente Uzonyi wrote:
>> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012, Igor Stasenko wrote:
>>> Err, no.
>>> A "workspace" is where slave doing its work.
>>> But artifacts made by job(s) are stored in separate place.
>> Right, but as I said, the directory structure created by Jenkins
>> didn't match what the wiki says when we set up Jenkins. So, tt's still
>> worth checking the directory structure.
> The directory structure seems to be as it should be:
> xxxxxxxxx:/xxxxxxxxx/jobs/SqueakTrunk/builds/20$ ls -la
> total 864
> drwxr-xr-x 3 jenkins xxxxxx 4096 Oct 23 19:26 .
> drwxr-xr-x 21 jenkins xxxxxx 4096 Oct 23 19:21 ..
> drwxr-xr-x 3 jenkins xxxxxx 4096 Oct 23 19:26 archive
> -rw-r--r-- 1 jenkins xxxxxx 2906 Oct 23 19:26 build.xml
> -rw-r--r-- 1 jenkins xxxxxx 252 Oct 23 19:21 changelog.xml
> -rw-r--r-- 1 jenkins xxxxxx 857130 Oct 23 19:26 junitResult.xml
> -rw-r--r-- 1 jenkins xxxxxx 1312 Oct 23 19:26 log
> The deliverables are in the archive directory as expected. I think the
> build.xml is what is read to inform the web page.
> Looking at the site it seems a bit more stable than yesterday. Somewhat.
> Nothing has disappeared so far. Perhaps it's hardening a bit with use.
More information about the Box-Admins