Build.squeak.org and squeaksource.com in danger (was Re: [Box-Admins] Disk space usage on box3)

Ken Causey ken at kencausey.com
Fri Dec 6 18:44:11 UTC 2013


Done.  I left the old key in which you probably should remove.  FYI your 
username is frankshearar not simply frank.

Ken

On 12/06/2013 12:37 PM, Frank Shearar wrote:
> Would some kind soul add the following line in /home/frank/.ssh/authorized_keys?
>
> My old key's lost in a hard drive accident, so this key is for my new laptop:
>
> ssh-rsa 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
> frank-atuan
>
> (This is not a security violation: this is the _public_ part of the keypair.)
>
> I'll see what I can do about space.
>
> frank
>
> On 6 December 2013 17:40, Ken Causey <ken at kencausey.com> wrote:
>> On 12/06/2013 11:19 AM, David T. Lewis wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks Ken,
>>>
>>> I will look at it as soon as I get home, about 8 hours from now.
>>>
>>> Frank,
>>>
>>> There's not much I can do on the squeaksource.com side other than move the
>>> repository to another box (which is not easy to do). Short term we need to
>>> tidy up the build.squeak.org jobs where can can.
>>>
>>> Dave
>>
>>
>> Thanks Dave,
>>
>> I agree that it is probably easier to find some space to clear up under
>> build.squeak.org but I think the community as a whole has to give some
>> serious thought to the future of squeaksource.com.
>>
>> It seems to me that at least a couple GB could be cleared up by archiving
>> some old dead projects (I have a couple I should do so with but I doubt they
>> amount to much) and migrating away more active ones. Ideally the owners of
>> those projects would stand up and volunteer therefore avoiding a
>> sequester-style across the board trim.  Frankly I think squeaksource.com
>> must be closed to all writes and serve a purely archive function, at best
>> given the resources we have currently.
>>
>> If someone else doesn't do so I may call for volunteers to archive and move
>> existing projects myself next week on squeak-dev.  I'm hoping we can at
>> least come up with some space savings in the short term that will give us
>> some weeks to think and discuss.
>>
>> Regarding moving squeaksource.com to another server: we do have another
>> server where there is more space but that is technically designated for
>> other purposes.  The sad fact is that there is not a lot more space
>> available on box3 and box4 combined than we have on the old box2 server.
>>
>> Server  Total HD Size
>>
>> Box2       146GB (aka squeak.org, lists.squeakfoundation.org, etc.)
>> Box3        60GB
>> Box4       103GB
>>
>> The new additions build.squeak.org and squeaksource.com currently add up to
>> about 54GB.  I think you will agree that the math here does not work out.
>>
>> I guess my point is that moving squeaksource.com (to any other existing
>> server we have), as a solution, is only a temporary solution.
>>
>> Ken
>
>



More information about the Box-Admins mailing list