Jenkins server name (was Re: [Box-Admins] Private keys)

[Frank Shearar]

On 9 January 2013 19:58, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de> wrote:
>
> On 09.01.2013, at 11:30, Ken Causey <ken at kencausey.com> wrote:
>
>> On 01/09/2013 12:43 PM, Chris Cunnington wrote:
>>> On 2013-01-09 1:37 PM, Ken Causey wrote:
>>> Fine by me. squeakci.org expires on 4 March and I'm happy to let it expire.
>>>> But I know you spent some money to get that domain name and it has a
>>>> rather specific purpose. I would appreciate it though if you would
>>>> suggest an alternative squeak.org hostname, perhaps ci.squeak.org or
>>>> jenkins.squeak.org which can be used as an alternative (alongside
>>>> squeakci.org) and perhaps even the primary access method by users.
>>> We can switch it to whatever you like.
>>
>> Thank you.  I'm open to suggestions.  ci.squeak.org is nice due to it's shortness, but maybe it is too short or unclear?  jenkins.squeak.org? build.squeak.org?
>
>
> My naming preferences is for role not implementation (e.g. rather "www.squeak.org" than "apache.squeak.org" or "nginx.squeak.org"). I like "build" a tiny bit better than "ci" because it's more descriptive to average people like me ;)

OK, consider me swayed!

frank

> - Bert -
>
>