[Box-Admins] Re: [Vm-dev] SystemTracing: SystemTracing-dtl.24.mcz

[David T. Lewis]

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:02:08PM +0200, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> 
> On 2013-05-14, at 11:41, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On 14 May 2013 10:37, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de> wrote:
> >> 
> >> On 2013-05-14, at 10:55, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
> >> 
> >>> 
> >>> Am 14.05.2013 um 10:40 schrieb Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com>:
> >>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> On 14 May 2013 11:02,  <squeak-dev-noreply at lists.squeakfoundation.org> wrote:
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Dave Lewis uploaded a new version of SystemTracing to project SystemTracing:
> >>>>> http://www.squeaksource.com/SystemTracing/SystemTracing-dtl.24.mcz
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> ==================== Summary ====================
> >>>> 
> >>>> We're seeing a whole lot of dups. What's wrong with the infrastructure?
> >>>> 
> >>>> frank
> >>> 
> >>> This is an indication that the squeaksource.com image was restarted
> >>> but not saved lately. The "recovery" process collects
> >>> the mcz's from disk an processes them as if they were commited just
> >>> now, hence, sends out emails.
> >>> If someone with access to the image would save it after recovery,
> >>> these dups wouldn't appear.
> >>> 
> >>> Best
> >>>      -Tobias
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Seems like as good a time as ever to really do something about squeaksource.com. I'm slacking, sorry. Anyone wants to champion this?
> > 
> > You mean to move the projects (OSProcessPlugin's also spamming us)
> > over to ss3 or SmalltalkHub? Agreed. I'd prefer it if Dave did it
> > (because he's the main committer, not just because I'm lazy), but I'd
> > be willing to do the grunt work, as a semi-last resort.
> > 
> > frank
> 
> 
> No, I mean taking over the squeaksource.com server itself.
>

Is that an option? I'd be all for it.

I have been holding off on moving any of my projects from SqueakSource
because I don't know where to put them. I'm not very confident in
SmalltalkHub because I have not heard anything to suggest that it will
be managed better than the system it replaces. It also does not seem
to work behind a corporate firewall with Internet Explorer, not an
encouraging sign. SS3 seems to be fine but I don't know if it's intended
to be a long term solution.

source.squeak.org is reliable and problem free. If we could have SqueakSource
managed in a similar manner it would be great.

For the record: I really do appreciate the service that SqueakSource has
provided to the community over the years, including the efforts of the
volunteers who have done the support work for it.

Dave