[Box-Admins] Re: [Vm-dev] SystemTracing: SystemTracing-dtl.24.mcz

[Frank Shearar]

On 14 May 2013 12:53, David T. Lewis <lewis at mail.msen.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:02:08PM +0200, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>>
>> On 2013-05-14, at 11:41, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On 14 May 2013 10:37, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 2013-05-14, at 10:55, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> Am 14.05.2013 um 10:40 schrieb Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com>:
>> >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On 14 May 2013 11:02,  <squeak-dev-noreply at lists.squeakfoundation.org> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Dave Lewis uploaded a new version of SystemTracing to project SystemTracing:
>> >>>>> http://www.squeaksource.com/SystemTracing/SystemTracing-dtl.24.mcz
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> ==================== Summary ====================
>> >>>>
>> >>>> We're seeing a whole lot of dups. What's wrong with the infrastructure?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> frank
>> >>>
>> >>> This is an indication that the squeaksource.com image was restarted
>> >>> but not saved lately. The "recovery" process collects
>> >>> the mcz's from disk an processes them as if they were commited just
>> >>> now, hence, sends out emails.
>> >>> If someone with access to the image would save it after recovery,
>> >>> these dups wouldn't appear.
>> >>>
>> >>> Best
>> >>>      -Tobias
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Seems like as good a time as ever to really do something about squeaksource.com. I'm slacking, sorry. Anyone wants to champion this?
>> >
>> > You mean to move the projects (OSProcessPlugin's also spamming us)
>> > over to ss3 or SmalltalkHub? Agreed. I'd prefer it if Dave did it
>> > (because he's the main committer, not just because I'm lazy), but I'd
>> > be willing to do the grunt work, as a semi-last resort.
>> >
>> > frank
>>
>>
>> No, I mean taking over the squeaksource.com server itself.
>>
>
> Is that an option? I'd be all for it.
>
> I have been holding off on moving any of my projects from SqueakSource
> because I don't know where to put them. I'm not very confident in
> SmalltalkHub because I have not heard anything to suggest that it will
> be managed better than the system it replaces. It also does not seem
> to work behind a corporate firewall with Internet Explorer, not an
> encouraging sign. SS3 seems to be fine but I don't know if it's intended
> to be a long term solution.
>
> source.squeak.org is reliable and problem free. If we could have SqueakSource
> managed in a similar manner it would be great.
>
> For the record: I really do appreciate the service that SqueakSource has
> provided to the community over the years, including the efforts of the
> volunteers who have done the support work for it.

We need to pipe up on the squeaksource thread in the Pharo mailing list.

frank

> Dave
>