[Box-Admins] Re: squeaksource.com image changes

[David T. Lewis]

<OT>
I'm happy to note for the record that squeaksource.com has been running
without interruption for almost two weeks since I last restarted the image.
The slow socket leak is now approaching my safeguard limit of 800 open
descriptors, so I expect the image to restart itself some time in the
next day or so. After that occurs, I'll start reading the man pages for
supervise(8) and figure out how to set that up properly. Aside from that
things seem quite stable now :-)
</OT>

On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 02:11:05PM -0500, Chris Muller wrote:
> I'm going through Dave's image and looking at all changes and merging
> them into the current SqueakSource package maintained at
> source.squeak.org/ss.
> 
> Dave's squeaksource.com image runs with a dirty Monticello package.
> All but one of the changes appear to be in trunk.  The one that's not
> -- Bert, you made this change to MCVersionMerger>>#addVersion: to
> remove the lines indicated with an X in front:
> 
> addVersion: aVersion
>      records add: (MCMergeRecord version: aVersion).
> X     aVersion dependencies do:
> X          [ : ea | | dep |
> X          dep := ea resolve.
> X          (records anySatisfy:
> X               [ : r | r version = dep ]) ifFalse: [ self addVersion: dep ] ]
> 
> Does this need to be a permanent MC change?  What is the purpose of this?
> 
> 
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 4:58 PM, David T. Lewis <lewis at mail.msen.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 05:33:31PM +0200, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> >> On 2013-10-02, at 17:17, "David T. Lewis" <lewis at mail.msen.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Would you mind putting a copy of the image and changes files for source.squeak.org
> >> > on box3 so I can take a look at it (I don't have access to box2)? Thanks.
> >>
> >> Done: ~bertfreudenberg/
> >>
> >
> > I have replaced the older squeaksource.com image with a newer image based on
> > the source.squeak.org image that Bert provided. I activated the new image
> > on box3.squeak.org today, and am monitoring it for problems.
> >
> > I started the repository export yesterday and completed the import to the new
> > image today. During that period there have been no commits to squeaksource.com,
> > so I anticipate no loss of data.
> >
> > The new image is called ~ssdotcom/SqueakSource/squeaksource.3.image. In the
> > event of problems, the rollback plan is to reactivate the older
> > ~ssdotcom/SqueakSource/squeaksource.2.image (see ~ssdotcom/README for details).
> >
> > Currently the new image is running and appears to work fine (although users
> > may have noticed some brief outages, for which I apologize).  However it is
> > currently consuming a heavy CPU load, so I am watching to see if this goes
> > down (I have seen similar patterns in the past related to cache updates,
> > which seem to settle down after a while). If the CPU load does not go back
> > down within the next hour, I will revert back to the old image and try this
> > again on another day.
> >
> > Dave
> >