[Box-Admins] Re: [squeak-dev] Re: [Seaside] SqueakSource/Seaside question - has anyone seen this problem before?

Tobias Pape Das.Linux at gmx.de
Tue Jan 14 00:02:03 UTC 2014


On 14.01.2014, at 00:36, David T. Lewis <lewis at mail.msen.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:10:56AM +0100, Tobias Pape wrote:
>> 
>> On 14.01.2014, at 00:00, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>>> It seems clear (as previously noted) that we really need to update our
>>>> source.squeak.org and squeaksource.com images to use an up to date Seaside.
>>> 
>>> A prerequisite to that is to update our source.squeak.org and
>>> squeaksource.com images to be 4.5 images.
>>> 
>>> Just FYI -- I've done with the source.squeak.org backup on box4.  It's
>>> running the code which is committed to the "ss" repository of
>>> source.squeak.org (so, self hosting its own code) in a 2-month old
>>> trunk image.
>>> 
>>> A future step to update Seaside in there would be nice.
>> 
>> Or, y'know, just upgrade to SS3 in the forseable future?
>> 
> 
> This is going to sound ignorant because it is ... would it be feasible
> to move the current squeaksource.com repository onto SS3 and keep it
> running as if (from the user point of view) nothing had happened?
> 

It is possible but certainly some work.
Andreas had written an xml-im/exporter that can be used
to export the squeaksource.com image
and re-import it into a ss3 image with marginal changes.

> My goal for squeaksource.com is to keep it reliable and available as a
> resource to the community. I updated it to match the code base for
> source.squeak.org for that reason only. If the repository could be
> moved to SS3 to provide a more reliable system, that might be a very
> good thing.
> 
> The only thing from my personal point of view is that I cannot put a
> great deal of time into development or changes to the system. I just
> want squeaksource.com to work and be reliable, that is all.

Yes. but this need a time investment, one way or another

best
	-tobias (in autopilot mode, it’s late)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1665 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/box-admins/attachments/20140114/9abaf5d4/signature.pgp


More information about the Box-Admins mailing list