[Box-Admins] Re: [squeak-dev] Re: [Seaside] SqueakSource/Seaside question - has anyone seen this problem before?

[Tobias Pape]

On 14.01.2014, at 13:50, David T. Lewis <lewis at mail.msen.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:25:14AM +0100, Tobias Pape wrote:
>> 
>> On 14.01.2014, at 11:21, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hm, I thought Tobias meant "run source.squeak.org's image with SS3
>>> code" rather than "move source.squeak.org's code to the SS3 servers".
>>> 
>>> Which would address your concerns about external/internal projects,
>>> and the need to self-host.
>> 
>> Yes.
>> 
> 
> That was my understanding of the conversation as well.

So you argue that patching ssc (squeaksource.com) to support newer 
Squeak and Seaside *again* is easier or more sustainable than
migrating to the sqeaksource3 codebase?

Best
	-Tobias
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1665 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/box-admins/attachments/20140114/8876673d/signature.pgp