[Box-Admins] Fwd: source.squeak.org password reset

Levente Uzonyi leves at caesar.elte.hu
Fri Aug 12 00:23:30 UTC 2016


Hi Chris,

On Thu, 11 Aug 2016, Chris Muller wrote:

> Hi Levente, what needs fixed, did you mean the subseconds were fixed
> in trunk but not the Squeak3.11-8824-SS.image?

Yes.

>
> I have your feedback from my note "source.squeak.org server upgrade"
> which I intend to review after the release.  In the meantime, for this
> old image, we're supposed to be able to open an RFB view on the old
> image by sending it a kill signal (not sure which one).

No, it has no RFB installed. That only works on squeaksource.com.

>
> There used to be some kind of README or something which described the
> process, but I can't seem find it on the server..  It shuts it down,
> reopens it with RFB so one can connect to it via VNC.

I saw some signs of RFB being there, but I couldn't find anything working. 
The image has no RFB installed.

>
> If we can manage to do that then another option is we could reset the
> users password to something and ask them to change it.  That might be
> safer than changing the code of the production image.

Changing the code is quite safe and it would be future proof. With RFB 
both could be done.

Levente

>
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 6:57 AM, Levente Uzonyi <leves at caesar.elte.hu> wrote:
>> I can try to download the image, fix it manually, and reupload it, but I
>> don't know what side-effects this would have. Anyone fluent with ss?
>>
>> Levente
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 10 Aug 2016, Levente Uzonyi wrote:
>>
>>> delivery 654003: failure:
>>> 209.85.201.26_failed_after_I_sent_the_message./Remote_host_said:_550-5.
>>>
>>> 7.1_[173.246.104.42______11]_Our_system_has_detected_that_this_message_is/550-5.7.1_not_RFC_5322_compliant._To_reduce_the_amount_of_spam_sent_to_Gmail
>>>
>>> ,/550-5.7.1_this_message_has_been_blocked._Please_review/550_5.7.1__RFC_5322_specifications_for_more_information._t31si26291126qta.62_-_gsmtp/
>>>
>>> One thing I noticed is that MailMessage >> #dateStampNow has sub-second
>>> part, which is not allowed by the RFC. It has been fixed in 2011.
>>>
>>> Levente
>>>
>>> On Wed, 10 Aug 2016, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is it broken? Can someone help Ronie?
>>>> - Bert -
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: Ronie Salgado <roniesalg at gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 3:25 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [Vm-dev] I need commit permissions to the VMMaker project
>>>> To: Squeak Virtual Machine Development Discussion
>>>> <vm-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you very much ;) . Now I forgot my password and I am not receiving
>>>> the password recovery emails. Aargg. I sent an email to the
>>>> administrator, hopefully it will be read.
>>>>
>>>> 2016-08-09 18:57 GMT+02:00 Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de>:
>>>>
>>>>       On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Ronie Salgado <roniesalg at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>             Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I am Ronie Salgado, the author of Woden. I am working in the Lowcode
>>>> extended bytecodes which I want to integrate into main branch of
>>>> the VMMaker.
>>>>
>>>> With Eliot we have already discussed about the integration of this
>>>> project.
>>>>
>>>> My source.squeak.org initials are rsf (Ronie Salgado Faila).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You're in. Welcome! :)
>>>>
>>>> - Bert -
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>


More information about the Box-Admins mailing list