[Box-Admins] Re: Move Jenkins? (was: Access to the new server(s))

Frank Shearar frank.shearar at gmail.com
Thu Sep 29 17:29:27 UTC 2016


I think using TravisCI instead of our solution is a fabulous idea, and
wholeheartedly support the move to same.

frank

On 29 September 2016 at 05:20, David T. Lewis <lewis at mail.msen.com> wrote:

> CC to Frank because he may not be following these discussions.
>
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 10:03:41AM +0000, Fabio Niephaus wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:31 AM Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
> >
> > > Dear all
> > >
> > > [ACTIONS AT END]
> > >
> > > with retroactive blessing of Levente, I have now prepared eight VMs on
> > > Rackspace.
> > > Here's the overview:
> > >
>
> <snip>
>
> > > - Do we need Jenkins anymore?
> > >
> >
> > We moved Squeak-Trunk to TravisCI, so if there isn't anything else
> > important still running there, I'd say no.
> >
>
> I have still been using a couple of test projects on build.squeak.org
> but overall it is not maintained, and I do not think that we should
> continue to make it publicly visible (links from squeak.org) in that
> condition.
>
> My suggestion is that we should copy /var/lib/jenkins directory to
> Rackspace if space permits, so that we do not lose it in the move.
> Aside from that, I don't think it is something we need to spend time
> on for the move. If we want to put it back on line, we can do that
> later if and when a volunteer steps forward.
>
> If the real CI work is happening on TravisCI now, then we should see
> if we can point build.squeak.org at that system.
>
> Dave
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/box-admins/attachments/20160929/81ac0fdf/attachment.htm


More information about the Box-Admins mailing list