[Cryptography Team] Developing in what image/version/build?

[Ron Teitelbaum]

That's very interesting, I'm using 3.9 fulltime and I don't have any of the
problems you are experiencing.  Although I'm not using Morphic lists.  How
can I see this bug, do you have a bug number?  I did have the image freezing
problem but we figured that out.  It was the seaside code for comet.
Bumping up the priority fixed the problem.  There were some fixes I had to
do to Monticello but that was only for Configurations.  

I'm sure you very good reasons for using 3.8 I'd like to hear more about
them to see if I can replicate them.  Are you on a Mac, *nix, or Win?

I'm not trying to encourage you to move just curious.  It's good to know
what bugs you can expect to encounter.

Ron


> -----Original Message-----
> From: cryptography-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> [mailto:cryptography-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] On Behalf Of
> Chris Muller
> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 8:37 PM
> To: cryptography at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> Subject: Re: [Cryptography Team] Developing in what image/version/build?
> 
> There's plenty about 3.9 that is less than acceptable.  I've moved back to
> 3.8 my forward development until 3.9 improves.
> 
> I recommend 3.8 for new Squeakers.  3.9 has some real usability issues
> that turn off new and old users alike; like lists jumping around upon
> selection is just one of many.  3.8 offers a cleaner start, less
> confusing, and you don't have Monticello packages with changes in the base
> image.  The uninterruptable image lockups though, all on their own, were
> plenty enough for me to switch back.
> 
> 3.9 has that new window look, but you can get that in 3.8 real easy if you
> want:
> http://map.squeak.org/package/3f07c64c-e22f-42ef-91e1-40c7e0de9185
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Cryptography mailing list
> Cryptography at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cryptography