[Cryptography Team] ECC and/or NSA Suite B?

Ron Teitelbaum Ron at USMedRec.com
Fri Nov 24 23:07:17 UTC 2006


Not sure but it would be a good thing to look at.

Ron

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cryptography-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> [mailto:cryptography-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] On Behalf Of
> Cerebus
> Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 5:48 PM
> To: Ron at usmedrec.com; Cryptography Team Development List
> Subject: Re: RE: [Cryptography Team] ECC and/or NSA Suite B?
> 
> On 11/24/06, Ron Teitelbaum <Ron at usmedrec.com> wrote:
> > I already wrote the smalltalk version of SHA256, which works great but
> is
> > slow.  We need the slang code now.
> 
> There's a couple of things that are really slow.  I've not had enough
> patience yet to let Diffie-Hellman Group 2 keys finish generating on
> my PB G4.
> 
> 1024-bit RSA keys generate in a couple of seconds, though.  Why the
> difference?
> 
> -- Tim
> _______________________________________________
> Cryptography mailing list
> Cryptography at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cryptography



More information about the Cryptography mailing list