[Cryptography Team] Monticello Configurations Re: your thoughts

Fri Mar 13 04:42:15 UTC 2020

Hi Rob,

Put you mouse where the number 2 is in the image and right click (or option
click) the mouse to add repositories.  You should see a menu that says Add
Repository.

That is the window where repositories are listed.  The top window is
packages, the middle window is repositories, the last window is Repository
details that show you the details of the selected repository in the middle
window.

All the best,

Ron

On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 12:35 AM Robert <robert.withers at pm.me> wrote:

> Hi Ron,
>
> I tried what you said, although I could not find where to do number 2. I
> went straight to number 3. I saved it as ProCrypto-1.1.1-rww.1 in the
> Cryptography repository. I go to load the config in a fresh image and I get
> this in the Transcript:
>
> ERROR: Version CryptographyCore-rww.5 not found in any repository
>
> ERROR: Aborting
>
> I do not know how to tell it to look in Cryptography. Note that when I
> saved the config, it asked me which Repo to save to. And there it is in
> Cryptography. But it doesn't work right.
>
> tyk, r
> On 3/13/20 12:20 AM, Ron Teitelbaum wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> 1. From the Open Menu select Monticello Configurations.
> 2. Right click and Add Repositories (Cryptography)
> 3. Add Packages.  Add all of the packages you want loaded in the order you
> want them loaded.
> 4. Store and name the configuration with the version number:
> ProCrypto-1.001.1  I would recommend the 001 instead of .1 so that the
> order stays consistent over time unless you do not expect to have more than
> 9 sub versions.
>
> When you are updating the map just load the new packages in your image,
> open the map from the monticello browser (browse the cryptography
> repository and select ProCrypto and press browse), then press the Update
> button and "select from image" (or something like that) to update the
> configuration with the packages loaded in the image.  It will pick up the
> new packages.  Then Store and bump the number.
>
> You can also open a Monticello Configuration by selecting it in the repo
> (browse the repo to find it) and selecting browse, and then install that
> configuration by pressing the install button.  if the order is important
> you can order them with the up, down buttons, and you can remove a package
> if it is no longer needed.  Post does something but I'm not really sure
> what :).  Configurations can also include multiple repositories but that is
> an advanced lesson for another day :).
>
> [image: Capture.PNG]
>
> Hope that helps!
>
> All the best,
>
> Ron Teitelbaum
>
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 11:56 PM Robert <robert.withers at pm.me> wrote:
>
>> Alright, so promote ProCrypto as the release version but keep all the
>> package names the same. One move that will occur, once we have Levente work
>> in CryptographyHashing, I was going to name that v1.2.1.
>>
>> Ok, a Monticello conf map, how do I do it? I can't seem to get it right.
>> And I know very little about them. Looking for instructions...
>>
>> k, r
>> On 3/12/20 11:52 PM, Ron Teitelbaum wrote:
>>
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> I like the promotion and the bunny. Just not the package name.  I think Cryptography
>> is a better name for the packages. So yes, if you would, can you go back
>> to that name? (I don't see the versions committed)  The version can be
>> saved as a Monticello conf map.
>>
>> If you want to commit the Monticello Configuration with all the proper
>> package versions loaded and call that ProCrypto-v1.001.1 that works for
>> me.
>>
>> All the best,
>>
>> Ron
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 11:03 PM Robert <robert.withers at pm.me> wrote:
>>
>>> I see, so am I making the wrong moves promoting ProCrypto? I was tying
>>> to indicate  the we have professional grade encryption and a specific
>>> release number (v1.1.1) and so I was trying to drum up some interest in
>>> college programs in encryption.
>>>
>>> Do you think I should roll back and call it Cryptography v1.1.1?
>>>
>>> thanks, r
>>>
>>>
>>> On 3/12/20 10:09 PM, Ron Teitelbaum wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Rob,
>>>
>>> The name ProCryptov sounds russian.  Not sure that the name really adds
>>> any benefit in terms of conveying meaning.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure what it is intended to mean.  I think name Cryptography is
>>> clear.
>>>
>>> All the best,
>>>
>>> Ron
>>>
>>> On 3/12/20 10:05 PM, David T. Lewis wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 12:29:32AM +0000, Robert wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey all'y'all,
>>>
>>> I have a question. As I am marketing Crypto/Squeak as ProCrypto and pointing them to the Cryptography repository, would it make sense to rename all these Cryptography packages as ProCryptov1_1_1?
>>>
>>>
>>> No, that would not make sense.
>>>
>>> Dave
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>> --
>>
> --
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20200313/66e577f8/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Bunny-Bow-Tie.png
Type: image/png
Size: 6482 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20200313/66e577f8/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Capture.PNG
Type: image/png
Size: 45769 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20200313/66e577f8/attachment-0003.png>