<html><head></head><body>
<p>Alright, so promote ProCrypto as the release version but keep all
the package names the same. One move that will occur, once we have
Levente work in CryptographyHashing, I was going to name that
v1.2.1.<br/>
<br/>
Ok, a Monticello conf map, how do I do it? I can't seem to get it
right. And I know very little about them. Looking for
instructions...</p>
<p>k, r<br/>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 3/12/20 11:52 PM, Ron Teitelbaum
wrote:<br/>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:CAEzdQ-cTgKiiaxJ1yvauMdFdS4KPQZ+64jELPa-2JShFbZLY8Q@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"/>
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Hi Rob,</div>
<div><br/>
</div>
<div>I like the promotion and the bunny. Just not the package
name. <span class="gmail_default">I think </span>Cryptography
is a better name<span class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"> for the packages</span>. So yes, if
you would, can you go back to that name? <span class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"> (I don't see
the versions committed) </span>The version can be saved as
a Monticello conf map.</div>
<div dir="auto"><br/>
</div>
<div dir="auto">If you want to commit the <span class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Monticello
Configuration with all the proper package versions loaded </span>and
call that ProCrypto<span class="gmail_default">-v1.001.1</span>
that works for me.</div>
<div dir="auto"><br/>
</div>
<div dir="auto">All the best,</div>
<div dir="auto"><br/>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Ron</div>
</div>
<br/>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 11:03
PM Robert <<a href="mailto:robert.withers@pm.me" moz-do-not-send="true">robert.withers@pm.me</a>> wrote:<br/>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<p>I see, so am I making the wrong moves promoting
ProCrypto? I was tying to indicate the we have
professional grade encryption and a specific release
number (v1.1.1) and so I was trying to drum up some
interest in college programs in encryption.</p>
<p>Do you think I should roll back and call it Cryptography
v1.1.1?</p>
<p>thanks, r</p>
<p><br/>
</p>
<div>On 3/12/20 10:09 PM, Ron Teitelbaum wrote:<br/>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Hi
Rob,</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br/>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">The
name ProCryptov sounds russian. Not sure that the
name really adds any benefit in terms of conveying
meaning. </div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br/>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">I'm
not sure what it is intended to mean. I think name
Cryptography is clear.</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br/>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">All
the best,</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br/>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Ron</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>On 3/12/20 10:05 PM, David T. Lewis wrote:<br/>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre>On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 12:29:32AM +0000, Robert wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre>Hey all'y'all,
I have a question. As I am marketing Crypto/Squeak as ProCrypto and pointing them to the Cryptography repository, would it make sense to rename all these Cryptography packages as ProCryptov1_1_1?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre>No, that would not make sense.
Dave
</pre>
</blockquote>
<div>-- <br/>
<img src="cid:part2.30E06F8A.2D9C1CDD@pm.me" class="" border="0"/></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br/>
<img src="cid:part2.30E06F8A.2D9C1CDD@pm.me" border="0"/></div>
</body></html>