[etoys-dev] Build 47: Still Problem Updating to latest Etoys

[Bert Freudenberg]

On 07.12.2009, at 07:27, Milan Zimmermann wrote:
> 
> On December 3, 2009, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>> Now development on 0.88
>> started, and there is a long thread on the Sugar dev list about changing
>> the activity version numbers from a single integer to a more common
>> major.minor scheme. I'll hold off sending this other mail until the
>> discussion is settled (though you may start thinking about what version
>> numbers we'd like to use for the Etoys activity).
> 
> Do you meant to change the versioning from sequential (113, 114 etc) to 
> something else, or just which Etoys version - 4.0, 4.1 (dr geo?) , 5.0 - to 
> target for 0.88?

The former.

- Bert -