[etoys-dev] Re: Development repository for Etoys

[Bert Freudenberg]

On 07.02.2010, at 08:19, Karl Ramberg wrote:
> 
> Korakurider skrev 2010-02-07 17:05:
>> On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 8:40 PM, karl ramberg<karlramberg at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>   
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 3:44 AM, Korakurider<korakurider at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>     
>>>> Could anyone care to comment on this?
>>>> I can't see meaningful discussion in IRC log, moreover without log I
>>>> can't even see software meeting has been really held recently...
>>>> /Korakurider
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Korakurider<korakurider at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>       
>>>>> Hello.
>>>>> When will the replacement of svn.squeakland.org go live?
>>>>> I think the fact we don't have central repository has been real blocker
>>>>> to make any development go forward.
>>>>> 
>>>>> /Korakurider
>>>>> 
>>>>>         
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> etoys-dev mailing list
>>>> etoys-dev at squeakland.org
>>>> http://lists.squeakland.org/mailman/listinfo/etoys-dev
>>>>       
>>> Hi,
>>> I never used svn.squeakland.org
>>> How was it used in Etoys development ?
>>>     
>>    Server storage of the update stream was the svn server, so you
>> surely had been using it :-)
>>    And Etoys installers had been built from artifacts on the svn repo.
>>    see http://wiki.squeakland.org/display/sq/Creating+Etoys+Release+for+Squeakland%2C+OLPC%2C+or+Etoys-to-go
>> 
>> Without replacement of the repo we can't release anything.
>> 
>> /Korakurider
>> 
>>   
> 
> Ah,
> Yes, the update stream must be activated again.
> 
> karl

Seems we are blocking on Tim. Distributing the admin responsibilities might not be a bad idea. How about we ask the squeak.org folks for hosting? Might be good in the long term anyway.

- Bert -