[etoys-notify] [JIRA] Updated: (SQ-1034) Are we sure vocabularies are correctly integrated ?

[Scott Wallace (JIRA)]

     [ http://tracker.squeakland.org/browse/SQ-1034?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Scott Wallace updated SQ-1034:
------------------------------

    Fix Version/s: etoys 5.1
                       (was: etoys 5.0.1)

> Are we sure vocabularies are correctly integrated ?
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SQ-1034
>                 URL: http://tracker.squeakland.org/browse/SQ-1034
>             Project: squeakland
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Bert Freudenberg
>             Fix For: etoys 5.1
>
>
> We have many more vocabularies now (see initializeStandardVocabularies). Some where added for this release, some in previous ones.
> However, are we sure they are correctly integrated? When I browse references to the old list types, e.g. TrailStyle, I see they are listed in at least two more places, namely:
>        ScriptEditorMorphBuilder>>literal:
>        SymbolListType>>representsAType
> The latter seems to govern the inclusion of a list type in the type menu of a new variable. So shouldn't all new types be listed there? But why are some of the older ones left out, too? And what is the #literal: method about? Maybe there should be a single place listing valid user types?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tracker.squeakland.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira