[etoys-notify] [JIRA] Created: (SQ-1034) Are we sure vocabularies are correctly integrated ?

[Karl Ramberg (JIRA)]

Are we sure vocabularies are correctly integrated ?
---------------------------------------------------

                 Key: SQ-1034
                 URL: http://tracker.squeakland.org/browse/SQ-1034
             Project: squeakland
          Issue Type: Improvement
            Reporter: Bert Freudenberg
             Fix For: etoys 5.0


We have many more vocabularies now (see initializeStandardVocabularies). Some where added for this release, some in previous ones.

However, are we sure they are correctly integrated? When I browse references to the old list types, e.g. TrailStyle, I see they are listed in at least two more places, namely:

       ScriptEditorMorphBuilder>>literal:
       SymbolListType>>representsAType

The latter seems to govern the inclusion of a list type in the type menu of a new variable. So shouldn't all new types be listed there? But why are some of the older ones left out, too? And what is the #literal: method about? Maybe there should be a single place listing valid user types?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tracker.squeakland.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira