Preparing for Exupery 0.12

[bryce at kampjes.demon.co.uk]

Andrew Tween writes:
 > Hi Bryce,
 > <bryce at kampjes.demon.co.uk> wrote in message 
 > news:18208.64387.667269.214411 at gargle.gargle.HOWL...
 > >
 > > I've decided to release what I've got. There's more than enough in
 > > this release to justify releasing. The background compiler now runs
 > > for about a hour. It'll still need some work before it is practical,
 > > that's probably next.
 > >
 > > This release
 > >  * Has a background compiler that can be run for about a hour
 > >  * Has many bug fixes
 > >  * Merges in David and John's 32 bit clean work and makes Exupery
 > >    32 bit clean.
 > >
 > > Andy, when can you build a Window's VM?
 > 
 > I'll try to do this in the next couple of days.
 > Please could you let me know the version numbers of the Exupery packages to 
 > use, and also which image you are using to build from (3.8, 3.9, 3.10, 
 > 3.10-dev etc).
 > Thanks,
 > Andy

I'm building in 3.9 squeak-dev images. Any 3.9 or 3.8 image should
work.

It's versions
	Exupery-wbk.274.mcz
	VMMaker-wbk.78.mcz

It may be worthwhile finding the C source for the 32 bit clean work.
I'm not sure if this was a problem on Windows.

The easiest way of building an Exupery development image now
is to load "Exupery development" from package universes. It's
necessary to update CommandShell from SqueakMap so GraphViz will
work.

Bryce