[Q] Magma Performance in Seaside

[Sungjin Chun]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Chris Muller wrote:
>> The performance problem is that it takes too much time for displaying
> 
> Hard to say, perhaps this includes the time to establish the session? 
> I think Gjaller is an example for session-pooling.  Also, Keith Hodges
> did some work with Pier.
> 

Yes, including session establishing time. WAMagmaSession does create
session. Can I find example/reference for session-pooling?

Thanks in advance.

PS)
I'm currently testing OmniBase + OmniBaseSupport. It's not that easy
compared to Magma but the displaying speed is faster(much, less that 1
sec). But if magma does show this kind of performance, I will change(
because at least for me, magma is more easy to use. OmniBase does have
too much restriction, newPersistent and others)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFfKbgQqspS1+XJHgRAnnyAKCrka+aG7vTdYKvAWVFYNFYb6kzUACg2KvF
VRY3GtDGxFqtWJue7cBNmlA=
=2W1n
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----