Single User vs Multi User quetions

Milan Zimmermann milan.zimmermann at sympatico.ca
Tue Jan 20 06:26:12 UTC 2009


Hi Chris,

Thanks for your comments - my notes inline:

On Monday 19 January 2009, Chris Muller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Continuing with the examples in
> >
> > http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/2689
> >
> > It sounds like when I want to have more than 1 connection (session) to
> > Magma, I have to use the "Server/Client" connection mode described there
> > - the single user mode would not allow 2 correctly functional sessions,
> > is that correct?
>
> No, you may have many locally-connected sessions.  Which part of the
> documentation "sounds like" otherwise?

Well, I misread. I realize "single user" is not equivalent to "single 
session", this is what I misread:

"Single-user mode
If you know will be operating in a single-user environment, starting a second 
image to run the server may not always be convenient."

I inferred that multi user requires client/server environment, (which can run 
in single or multiple images - I hope I understand correctly that this is 
true), but I erroneously assumed 
	"single user" = "single session."
>
> > Also a follow up question: I am not sure how to understand the following:
> >
> > "While your session is connected, it is recommended you keep up-to-date
> > every 30 seconds or so changes made by other users will be reflected in
> > the objects you visit."
>
> Changes by other users are not visible to a session until it crosses a
> transaction boundary with #begin, #commit or #abort.

ok, that is clear,

Thanks, Milan

>
>  - Chris


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/magma/attachments/20090120/374e1380/attachment.htm


More information about the Magma mailing list