difference between MaDictionary and MagmaDictionary
Esteban Lorenzano
estebanlm at gmail.com
Tue Dec 14 12:29:38 UTC 2010
mmm...
AFAIU the objective of using magma collections is to avoid the read/write of big collections.... and I have this structure:
MaDictionary
key -> MagmaCollection (big)
key -> MagmaCollection (big)
key -> MagmaCollection (big)
If I replace MaDictionary with Dictionary, I will be reading/writing the full dictionary each time I add an element to the dictionary... isn't?
btw... I'm using an unique MagmaSession to connect to repository (no real need of other... no more than 3 users connected at the same time)... and the real reason I'm asking this is because my application continues crashing each one or two days, and I can't figure out what's happening :(
So, any "best practice" I can use would be really welcome (I'm a little bit lost here... I'm new to magma in production, used just for toy project before this :( )
Cheers,
Esteban
El 14/12/2010, a las 6:12a.m., Igor Stasenko escribió:
> On 14 December 2010 01:40, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I wonder what's the difference between MaDictionary and MagmaDictionary... and which should I use... is indistinct?
>>
>
> I think you better do not use these dicts. They are mainly for
> internal use only.
> They are optimized for speed not for space. And taking part in keeping
> correspondence between
> objects stored in database and their ids.
>
>> Cheers,
>> Esteban_______________________________________________
>> Magma mailing list
>> Magma at lists.squeakfoundation.org
>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/magma
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
More information about the Magma
mailing list