[Morphic] Re: What is the status of Curvier and target setting
fixes
Juan Vuletich
jmvsqueak at uolsinectis.com.ar
Thu Jan 12 13:23:47 CET 2006
Hi Stef.
I will reload Etoys-stephaneducasse.2 and load the new changes there. That's
the proper solution to me.
Thanks
Juan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stéphane Ducasse" <stephane.ducasse at univ-savoie.fr>
To: "Juan Vuletich" <jmvsqueak at uolsinectis.com.ar>
Cc: "Peace Jerome" <peace_the_dreamer at yahoo.com>;
<morphic at lists.squeakfoundation.org>; <denker at iam.unibe.ch>
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 4:58 AM
Subject: Re: [Morphic] Re: What is the status of Curvier and target setting
fixes
Hi Juan
Is the problem solved when you reload Etoys-stephaneducasse.2?
I should say that I never really understand what was happening.
Tell me what you think is the right action to do since you did the
etoys refactorings.
Stef
On 12 janv. 06, at 03:09, Juan Vuletich wrote:
> Stef, before I publish new packages I want to ask you a question.
>
> I've just downloaded Squeak 3.9a-6707, and it has an unsaved version of
> Etoys. It seems a lot of methods have been removed from the package. I
> checked some of them, and I believe they belong there. Do you know who or
> why removed them? Is it ok to use 6707 as the base for publishing new
> versions? Or should I better load Etoys- stephaneducasse.2 to load the new
> stuff upon?
>
> Thanks,
> Juan Vuletich
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stéphane Ducasse"
> <stephane.ducasse at univ-savoie.fr>
> To: "Juan Vuletich" <jmvsqueak at uolsinectis.com.ar>
> Cc: "Peace Jerome" <peace_the_dreamer at yahoo.com>;
> <morphic at lists.squeakfoundation.org>; <denker at iam.unibe.ch>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 11:09 AM
> Subject: Re: [Morphic] Re: What is the status of Curvier and target
> setting fixes
>
>
> Excellent.
> If you can load them in the latest release and publish new package in
> inbox. I will issue a new script that includes them.
>
> On 10 janv. 06, at 00:18, Juan Vuletich wrote:
>
>> Hi Stef,
>>
>> I could take a look at Jerome's recent contributions and they are all
>> great to me.
>>
>> So, I have a bunch of changesets ready for inclusion.
>>
>> I can send the changesets for you to load and publish, or I could save
>> new versions of the packages in the inbox.
>>
>> Personally, I'd prefer the first option, because the Morphic packages
>> are quite big and I don't always have a broadband connection. But just
>> tell me how do you prefer.
>
> I prefer to have them in mcz but I can deal with cs.
>
> Stef
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Juan Vuletich
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "stéphane ducasse"
>> <ducasse at iam.unibe.ch>
>> To: "Juan Vuletich" <jmvsqueak at uolsinectis.com.ar>
>> Cc: "Peace Jerome" <peace_the_dreamer at yahoo.com>;
>> <morphic at lists.squeakfoundation.org>; <denker at iam.unibe.ch>
>> Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 4:40 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Morphic] Re: What is the status of Curvier and target
>> setting fixes
>>
>>
>> Thanks Juan
>> Let me know when you will have something ready for inclusion in 3.9
>>
>> Stef
>>
>> On 30 déc. 05, at 17:40, Juan Vuletich wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jerome,
>>>
>>> How do you like to be called? Jerome, Peace or wiz?
>>>
>>> Well, let's go to business. I've been looking at your contributions
>>> at http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/5768 . You have really done a
>>> lot of stuff for Squeak. Thank you!
>>>
>>> 01-Mantis-0504-CurvierMorph
>>> It seems good, and others have already looked at it. However, this cs
>>> includes many things that go outside the packages I can publish:
>>> - Collections | SequenceableCollection >> polynomialEval:
>>> - Kernel | Number>>isNonZero
>>> - Kernel | Object>>basicInspect (removed)
>>> - Kernel | Object>>beep (removed)
>>> - Kernel | Object>>beepPrimitive (removed)
>>> - Kernel | Object>>beep: (removed)
>>> - Kernel | Object>>break (source same but rev changed)
>>> - Kernel | Object>>contentsGetz: (removed)
>>> - Kernel | Object>>deprecatedExplanation: (removed)
>>> - Kernel | Object>>deprecated:explanation: (removed)
>>> - Kernel | Object>>doIfNotNil: (removed)
>>> - Kernel | Object>>ifKindOf:thenDo: (removed)
>>> - Kernel | Object>>inspect (removed)
>>> - Kernel | Object>>playSoundNamed: (removed)
>>> I could move Number>>isNonZero to Morphic (as the other
>>> implementors). But you would need to ask for the inclusion of
>>> SequenceableCollection >> polynomialEval: to the maintainers of
>>> Collections. And you need to ask the maintainers of Kernel for all
>>> that Object cleanup. If you agree, then I could publish all the
>>> Morphic stuff.
>>>
>>> 02-Mantis-0503-TargetSighting
>>> TargetSighter-wiz.005.pr does not load in 3.9a-6705. Is it needed? I
>>> believe all I should load is PopupThumbnails-wiz. 4.cs. Am I right?
>>> It looks ok, but this cs includes many things that go outside the
>>> packages I can publish:
>>> - Collections | Collection>>roundTo: (removed)
>>> - Graphics | Cursor (Class definition changed)
>>> - Graphics | Cursor class>>initialize (changed)
>>> - Graphics | Cursor class>>initTarget
>>> - Graphics | Cursor class>>target
>>> - Graphics | Point class>>fromUserWithCursor:
>>> - Graphics | Point>>guarded
>>> - Graphics | Point>>scaleTo:
>>> - ST80 | CustomMenu>>startUpWithCaption:at:
>>> - ST80 | CustomMenu>>startUp:withCaption:at:
>>> Collection>>asKownNameMenu is in new project ObjectMenu. Perhaps it
>>> could go in Morphic?
>>> As all this is required, we should coordinate the publication with
>>> the maintainers of Graphics and ST80. Could you contact them?
>>>
>>> 03-Mantis-0652-StarMorph
>>> - StarMorph-wiz.21.cs.gz This one seems to be loaded, except for the
>>> removals of StarMorph>>oneLessVertex, StarMorph>>oneMoreVertex.
>>> Should I remove them?
>>> - Star-wiz.4.mcz Moves StarMorph to a new package "Star". I guess
>>> this one is obsolete, isn't it?
>>> - Kaleido-wiz.5.mcz Pretty cool, but optional.
>>>
>>> 04-Mantis-1015-SnapView
>>> Very nice! Approved.
>>>
>>> 05-Mantis-1771-ClickExerciser
>>> Cool. Approved.
>>>
>>> 06-Mantis-1625-Thumbnails
>>> You understand this much better than me. I trust you.
>>>
>>> 07-Mantis-1484-TrashHalo
>>> Great!
>>>
>>> 08-Mantis-1454-ArrowPrototypeFix
>>> This one is already included in 01-Mantis-0504-CurvierMorph
>>>
>>> 09-Mantis-1347-ListDoubleClick
>>> The only change that goes in a Morphic package here is
>>> PluggableListMorph >> mouseUp:
>>> I guess I should load and publish it. Do you agree?
>>> The other changes go to the Tools package. You should ask its
>>> maintainers.
>>>
>>> I will publish new versions of the packages soon. I will include:
>>> 04-Mantis-1015-SnapView
>>> 05-Mantis-1771-ClickExerciser
>>> 06-Mantis-1625-Thumbnails
>>> 07-Mantis-1484-TrashHalo
>>> 08-Mantis-1454-ArrowPrototypeFix
>>>
>>> On the following, I will wait for your answers to my comments:
>>> 01-Mantis-0504-CurvierMorph
>>> 02-Mantis-0503-TargetSighting
>>> 03-Mantis-0652-StarMorph
>>> 09-Mantis-1347-ListDoubleClick
>>>
>>> 02-Mantis-0503-TargetSighting is the only one we would need to
>>> coordinate with other mainainers to publish everything together.
>>>
>>> After publishing the new versions of the packages, I will update
>>> Mantis, and prepare the new monthly report.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Juan Vuletich
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peace Jerome"
>>> <peace_the_dreamer at yahoo.com>
>>> To: <morphic at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
>>> Cc: <denker at iam.unibe.ch>; "stéphane ducasse" <ducasse at iam.unibe.ch>
>>> Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 3:32 AM
>>> Subject: [Morphic] Re: What is the status of Curvier and target
>>> setting fixes
>>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I do not think that the momorphiceam is a filter.
>>>>> I'm sure that you can have fun with them. Juan told
>>>>> me that he was busy
>>>>> and yes I definitively want your stuff in.
>>>>>
>>>>> StStef>
>>>>
>>>>> I'I'lake sure to check on the progress... all the
>>>> bubugreports>are in mantis, and I was planning of
>>>> asking the teams as
>>>>> soon as I see something that I would have included
>>>> myself.
>>>>
>>>>> Marcus
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Folks.
>>>>
>>>>> I wasn't subscribed to our list!
>>>>
>>>>> Peace, I'll later read your message and see what's
>>>> your work about.
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks, Juan
>>>>
>>>> Ah. That would explain the low activity on the list.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you all for your attention to this matters.
>>>>
>>>> The mantis links with the code seem to have been
>>>> looked at by CeCeesnd some others. I look forward to
>>>> seeing the curvier polygons and target sighting fixes
>>>> in a 3.9 image some time soon.
>>>>
>>>> The full set of fixes I deemed ready to go are listed
>>>> at:
>>>>
>>>> hthttp/minnow.cc.gagatechdeduqueak/5768
>>>>
>>>> This page has the links to mantis where the most
>>>> recent code can be obtained.
>>>>
>>>> There is more I have done on mantis (you can browse my
>>>> reports with the reporter set to wiwiz Most are in the
>>>> realm of momorphicAnd it someone posts a momorphicug
>>>> I'll usually take a look and maybe comment or adopt it
>>>> as a puzzle to be solved.
>>>>
>>>> Yours in service, (wiwizJerome Peace
>>>>
>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>> Do You Yahoo!?
>>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Morphic mailing list
>>>> Morphic at lists.squeakfoundation.org
>>>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/morphic
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>>> Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.1/206 - Release Date:
>>>> 12/16/2005
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.11/219 - Release Date:
>> 1/2/2006
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.16/225 - Release Date: 1/9/2006
>
>
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.16/225 - Release Date: 1/9/2006
More information about the Morphic
mailing list