[Newcompiler] Implementing bytecode for closur

[Marcus Denker]

On 26.04.2007, at 14:47, Marcus Denker wrote:


>
>> I think we should use other bytecode like pushTemp/storeTamp which  
>> would store/pop variable directly from the closure environment.
>> At the end we should be close to the performance to the  
>> NewCompiler without closure performance.


Another idea (I think Anthony proposed that in the past) is to have a  
getField / setField bytecode. Then you would have two
(pushEnvironment / getField) for accesing temps in blocks... the  
reason is that Environments can be nested, so just a
"getTemp 5" like bytecode is not enough.

And on the plus side, this bytecode could be used in persephone to  
inline getters/setters on self ;-)

	Marcus
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3947 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/newcompiler/attachments/20070426/271b4183/smime.bin