source.squeakfoundation.org (was Re: iSqueak)
ducasse at iam.unibe.ch
Tue Jun 28 07:44:59 UTC 2005
I cannot access
may be this is my settings but I get The proxy server received an
invalid response from an upstream server.
On 27 juin 05, at 17:59, Doug Way wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 17:15:16 +0200, "Avi Bryant"
> <avi.bryant at gmail.com>
>> On 6/27/05, Alexandre Bergel <bergel at iam.unibe.ch> wrote:
>>> But the Project 39a is still empty...
>> Ah, yes, it is. We do need to commit stuff there. I just didn't
>> understand the purpose of a script that created new packages when we
>> already have a changeset from Andreas that does so.
> Right, we can just use Andreas' changeset to do this partitioning.
> (which is very similar to Alexandre's script anyway, I think)
>> I'll populate that project shortly.
> Sounds good. By the way, does a SqueakSource "Developer" have
> access to
> do this initial populating (adding new packages), or do you need to be
> an Admin?
>>> I have many changes related to the system change notification
>>> that are waiting...
> Yes, that should give the new process a good workout. Hmm, how many
> packages do these change-notification changes cut across? :-)
> Realistically, it's going to take us a little while to get everything
> working smoothly with this new process. But we might as well dive in
> and get started. It's a big change, but I think it's flexible enough
> that we will be able to adjust the process if necessary, and we won't
> end up in a 3.3alpha modules situation.
> I will set up a new swiki page covering the new process, as a point of
> - Doug
More information about the Packages