3.9alpha update stream (was Re: source.squeakfoundation.org)

Avi Bryant avi.bryant at gmail.com
Thu Jun 30 12:06:51 UTC 2005

On 6/30/05, Daniel Vainsencher <danielv at techunix.technion.ac.il> wrote:
> Under the assumption that the placing of code under packages is done
> simply by creating an MC package for every otherwise-uncategorized
> method, and therefore is no work at all (I think that's what Andreas
> says that doIt does, if not, that's not hard to write):
> I think its better to have everything in packages, so people don't meet
> technical problems such as "I changed a bunch of methods, uploaded the
> packages that changed in MC, but one of my methods didn't appear".
> The down side is we might have a couple of dumb packages, but we'll be
> moving code between packages forever anyway (detangling), so who cares?

Ok.  So is it better to have a single dumb package ("Orphaned") or
lots of little dumb packages?  I lean towards the former.


More information about the Packages mailing list