partitioning a moving target
lex at cc.gatech.edu
Wed Mar 9 12:57:18 UTC 2005
goran.krampe at bluefish.se wrote:
> Avi Bryant <avi.bryant at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Should we be doing our partioning work based on Squeak 3.8 or 3.9a?
> Hmmm. I had envisioned doing it in 3.9a, since IMHO the work from this
> Team is the most important work right now.
I agree that it should be based on the current development stream. If
that is changing too fast, then we need to either quit this task for
now, or the development stream needs to be slowed down.
I am not so nervous, though. Probably a ton of code in the base image
is not changing quickly.
More information about the Packages