Upgrade scripts?

Bert Freudenberg bert at impara.de
Tue Oct 25 20:42:08 UTC 2005

Am 25.10.2005 um 22:12 schrieb Andreas Raab:

> Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>> I fixed the first MC bug, so if you load these:
>>     http://source.squeakfoundation.org/inbox/Monticello-bf.277.mcz
>>     http://source.impara.de/Stuff/Graphics-bf.24.mcz
>> you'll get an Abort notice when loading Graphics-bf.24 in an  
>> unsafe  image:
>>     (BitBlt canUnderstand: #displayString:from:to:at:kern:font:)
>>         ifFalse: [Abort new signal: 'need to load Graphics-ar.21   
>> first!']
> This looks good. Can I rely on this behavior in the future? I don't  
> know if what you say about packageinfo having scripts relates to or  
> invalidates the above. I'd be perfectly happy with the above solution.

Well, the script is executed if you have that fixed Monticello  
version, or PackageInfo with script support. Republishing the package  
will retain the script only if you have the right PackageInfo.

Unless we decide to remove script support from MC this should  
continue to work.

- Bert -

More information about the Packages mailing list